Many claim to be atheists, but it seems that there is a deep seated hatred for someone or something which has contributed to their overall bitterness. Hey, I will be the first to attest to being from the Anger Tradition and projecting my anger onto an object, which I perceived to be lesser. For many of the atheists, they perceive Christianity to be a blatantly ignorant tradition; caught in myths, spiritual story telling, ghouls, and ghosts, all surrounded by zombie like followers of a dead god. Sounds interesting, eh? I think though if one listened long enough to what they are saying it would be that, "Christianity is meant to be loving, it is meant to care for our needs, it is meant to display compassion, why does it not, why, why??" The people want a loving God, they want a God who accepts their flaws, accepts their questions, accepts their weakness, but most of all accepts that THEY will not accept everything which Christianity is laying down. Oh, wait, I was with you until that last part.
It seems as though God's grace has its limitations with people. God will not accept people who doubt, people who question him, or Christians don't accept people who question God. I don't know why but this drew me to start thinking about the story of Abraham and his son Isaac, when Abraham was told to sacrifice his son. If you know me, I am not one to usually relate something to a biblical story, so maybe this meant something. Abraham in the story seemed fairly ready and able to sacrifice his child at least from the perspective of the writer. From what we know about Mesopotamian culture, they had a fairly broad knowledge of the gods and this would not be a far stretch for a god to request a child sacrifice. Abraham willingly went, but it seems as though we have always read this story from the vantage point of Abraham, because it is easier for us to identify with a "father and son". If anyone else figured this out a long time ago, I apologize for my slowness, since I am just figuring this out, but the story is really about the unveiling of Yhwh to humanity. It is about the unveiling of a god who is beginning the process of transforming how humans treated other humans. Unveiling that Yhwh does not need the sacrifice to know the heart. The unveiling that the earth belongs to Yhwh and he has concern about children, it is the start of the transformative way which humanity sees its God. Maybe I started to think about this because people in the Yahoo section see the god of the Old Testament as so angry, because we have not portrayed this god to be the god who unveils his compassion, kindness, and love, over against the gods who demand the sacrifice of humans. It starts to make sense why the Lord would say, "Choose this day whom you will serve?" (My paraphrase) There were actually many choices in that day. How about in our day? Which god do we serve?
Which god do we serve? The god of civil religion who demands our sacrifice to war? The god of consumerism who demands our money and allegiance? The god of my anger? (That is meant for me) Without an inward critique of my own allegiance, I can not speak of any other allegiances. I will end this by saying be blessed, God loves us.
2 comments:
The ending of your post really reminds me of this story:
The Battle Within
It seems that unless we come from a non-ego place, we're always serving one or more "Gods" (or as some might call them False Prophets).
Nice Paul Pace. Nicely written.
Post a Comment